{"id":9794,"date":"2012-10-31T15:27:00","date_gmt":"2012-10-31T15:27:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dwarkaparichay.com\/blog\/2012\/10\/fdi-in-retail-has-to-come-in-parliamen\/"},"modified":"2018-06-04T16:58:37","modified_gmt":"2018-06-04T16:58:37","slug":"fdi-in-retail-has-to-come-in-parliamen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dwarkaparichay.com\/blog\/fdi-in-retail-has-to-come-in-parliamen\/","title":{"rendered":"FDI in Retail has to come in Parliament &#8211; No Escape route available with the Government"},"content":{"rendered":"<div dir=\"ltr\" style=\"text-align: left;\" trbidi=\"on\">\n<br \/>\n<b><i>Prembabu Sharma<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n<p>The Government of India has been bound by the Foreign Exchange Management&nbsp;Act, 1999 (FEMA) to face willingly or unwillingly both the houses of&nbsp;Parliament on the issue of FDI in Multi Brand Retail, in its forthcoming&nbsp;session. Majority of political parties is demanding a discussion on its&nbsp;decision of allowing FDI in Retail and the Government is avoiding&nbsp;discussing the issue in Parliament on the pretext that notification of&nbsp;allowing FDI in Retail is an executive decision which need not to have&nbsp;approval of the Parliament. But now, there is no escape route available&nbsp;with the Government but to go to Parliament to place any amendment in Rules&nbsp;and Regulations of FEMA made by the Reserve Bank of India in both the&nbsp;houses of Parliament which have the powers to agree, disagree or seek&nbsp;modification in the amendment\u201d-said Mr. Praveen Khandelwal,Secretary&nbsp;General of the Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) at a Press&nbsp;Conference held today at New Delhi.<\/p>\n<div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"separator\" style=\"clear: both; text-align: center;\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/-mP0109li8AI\/UJFJ5OktufI\/AAAAAAAAaEM\/34qdEDNGaq8\/s1600\/FDI+in+Retail.jpg\" imageanchor=\"1\" style=\"margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" height=\"468\" src=\"data:image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAAAAACH5BAEKAAEALAAAAAABAAEAAAICTAEAOw==\" data-layzr=\"http:\/\/dwarkaparichay.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/FDI-in-Retail.jpg\" width=\"640\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<div>\n<\/div>\n<div>\nMr. Naresh Sirohi, General Secretary, Bhartiya Kisan Morcha, Mr. Pradeep&nbsp;Sharma, Co-ordinator, Khudra FDI Virodhi Rashtriya Morcha, Mr.Saudan Singh&nbsp;and Mr. R. B. Singh Rajput of National Hawkers Federation, CAIT Delhi State&nbsp;President Mr. Narender Madan, National Secretary Mr.Ramesh Khanna, CAIT&nbsp;Delhi State Secretary General Mr. Vijay Pal, Shri Anil Gupta, Convenor,&nbsp;Bhariya Vitt Salahakar Samiti, Shri Ved Prakash Gupta, Convenor, MSME of&nbsp;the Morcha and other senior trade leaders were also present at the Press&nbsp;Conference.<\/p>\n<p>It is remembered that in a petition filed in Supreme Court some time back,&nbsp;the apex Court has directed the Reserve Bank of India to amend the Rules&nbsp;and Regulations to allow implementation of the Policy. The next hearing of&nbsp;the said case has been fixed for 5th November.<\/p>\n<p>Addressing the media, Mr. Anil Sharma, CA and Head of the research wing of&nbsp;CAIT said that as per the directions of the Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court, the RBI&nbsp;has to amend the regulations but under section 48 of the FEMA, every rule&nbsp;or regulation made under this Act  shall be laid, as soon as may be after&nbsp;it is made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session for a&nbsp;total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two&nbsp;or more successive sessions and if, before the expiry of the session&nbsp;immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid,&nbsp;both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or regulation, or&nbsp;both Houses agree that the rule or regulation should not be made, the rule&nbsp;or regulation shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be&nbsp;of no effect, as the case may be so, however, that such modification or&nbsp;annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously<br \/>\ndone under that rule or regulation.<\/p>\n<div>\n<br \/>\nCAIT National President Mr. B. C. Bhartia said that The Foreign Exchange&nbsp;Management Act, 1999 (FEMA) was enacted with the object of facilitating&nbsp;external trade and payment and for promoting the orderly development and&nbsp;maintenance of foreign exchange market in India. It extends to whole of&nbsp;India. He further said that under this section 6 (3) of FEMA empowers the&nbsp;Reserve Bank to issue, modify or amend any rules or regulations pertaining&nbsp;to Foreign Direct Investment in India. He further said that in exercise of&nbsp;the powers conferred by clause (3) of article 77 of the Constitution, for&nbsp;the allocation of the business of the Government of India, the Government&nbsp;of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961 have been framed. As per&nbsp;these Rules the business of the Government of India is allocated to Cabinet&nbsp;Secretariat and deemed to have been, allotted to the Prime Minister. The&nbsp;President may, on the advice of the Prime Minister, allocate the business<br \/>\nof the Government of India among Ministers by assigning one or more&nbsp;departments to the charge of a Minister.<\/p>\n<p>The Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion in the Ministry of&nbsp;Commerce is allocated the business of direct foreign and non-resident&nbsp;investment in industrial and service projects excluding functions entrusted<br \/>\nto the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs. The DIPP can only deal with&nbsp;policy matters relating to foreign direct investments in industrial and&nbsp;service projects including multi brand retail trade as the legal provisions<br \/>\nfor carrying out such activities in India are governed by FEMA and that can&nbsp;only be amended as provided in FEMA.<\/p>\n<p>In the present set up the logical sequence of permitting FDI in multi brand&nbsp;retail trade is (a) Policy decision by DIPP (b) Amendments in Regulation&nbsp;governing FDI by RBI (c) Approval of both Houses of Parliament of amendment&nbsp;in Regulation framed under FEMA in terms of section 48 of the Act.<\/p>\n<p>Both Mr. Bhartia and Mr. Khandelwal said that it is very clear from the&nbsp;above that though DIPP has taken a policy decision to allow FDI in multi&nbsp;brand retail trade but it can only be implemented after the next two&nbsp;processes are completed that is amendment in Regulations by RBI and&nbsp;approval of the amendment of &nbsp;Regulations by both the houses of Parliament.<\/p>\n<p>The CAIT has appealed the Reserve Bank of India and Government of India&nbsp;that before presenting the same to Parliament, wide publicity of the&nbsp;amendment in regulations to allow FDI in Multi Brand Retail so that the&nbsp;stakeholders can convey their views to Members of Parliament.<\/p>\n<p>In the meanwhile, the CAIT has decided to meet Leader of Opposition in both&nbsp;houses of the Parliament and senior leaders of all national and regional&nbsp;political parties to apprise them of the factual position so that a&nbsp;structured debate can be held on the issue as and when it is presented in&nbsp;Parliament in its forthcoming session by the Government. A CAIT delegation&nbsp;will also meet UPA Chairperson Smt. Sonia Gandhi to apprise her about the&nbsp;concerns of the stakeholders which has been ignored by the Government.<\/p><\/div>\n<div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Prembabu Sharma The Government of India has been bound by the Foreign Exchange Management&nbsp;Act, 1999 (FEMA) to face willingly or unwillingly both the houses of&nbsp;Parliament on the issue of FDI in Multi Brand Retail, in its forthcoming&nbsp;session. Majority of political parties is demanding a discussion on its&nbsp;decision of allowing FDI in Retail and the Government is avoiding&nbsp;discussing the issue in Parliament on the pretext that notification of&nbsp;allowing FDI in Retail is an executive decision which need not to have&nbsp;approval of the Parliament. But now, there is no escape route available&nbsp;with the Government but to go to Parliament to place any <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":40543,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22,1],"tags":[8,1879],"class_list":["post-9794","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business-news","category-update","tag-news-events","tag-update","has_thumb"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwarkaparichay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9794","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwarkaparichay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwarkaparichay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwarkaparichay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwarkaparichay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9794"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dwarkaparichay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9794\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":40544,"href":"https:\/\/dwarkaparichay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9794\/revisions\/40544"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwarkaparichay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/40543"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dwarkaparichay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9794"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwarkaparichay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9794"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dwarkaparichay.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9794"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}