Flat allotments – Still a distant DREAM ?

Ans.
19) IInd phase of computerisation has been completed in the year 2006-07
20) Computerisation of RCS office has been approved in the year 2000.
21) No delay.
22) updation of website is the duty of DOEACC, a Govt. autonomous body.
23) RCS office has two staff and six data entry operators.
24) As the CBI investigation is still pending and details of the societies
are yet to be verified, there may be few records are not updated in the
website.
25) Information flow from the zone to the website is a complete cycle for
the updation of website, so no single official is only responsible for
updation incase there is any incorrectness of information.
26) It was a design flaw, sooner it will be rectified.
27) Notices, Orders, Circulars and RTI information are already available
in the website, Generally these information are updated within 2/3 days of
receiving of information from the concern zones.
28) Answer as Sl. No. 24 ————————————————————— Dear All,

HELP PLEASE !!!

Can any one tell me the status of the New Rajput CGHS located in sector 12 (new name is Radison Apt.).
I am not able to find out its status on the website of cooperative socity.

I would appreciate if any one can share the information about it.

Regards
Rajesh ————————————————————-

Hi Can you share the list of the 110 societies cleared by CBI or where can one get this list to check if ones society is been cleared or not. Pls this information will be vital for a lot of us . Rajeev —————————————————–
I am also a member of the Pragatisheel bairwa society, awaiting allottment.

The recent orders and judgements have nothing to do with the societies where
CBI cases are pending.

In fact, I have informations that the list of 110 socieites , cleared by the
CBI, where allottment would be done by the end of the year does not have the
name of Pragatisheel Bairwa.

It appears that the CBI would register cases against the people found guilty
and may be then the Government thinks in terms of allotting flats to the
affected people.

Would suggest that at least we keep on exchanging informations here.

Regards,

Pratik
—————————————————- I am also a member of the Pragatisheel bairwa society, awaiting allottment.

The recent orders and judgements have nothing to do with the societies where CBI cases are pending.
In fact, I have informations that the list of 110 socieites , cleared by the CBI, where allottment would be done by the end of the year does not have the name of Pragatisheel Bairwa.
It appears that the CBI would register cases against the people found guilty and may be then the Government thinks in terms of allotting flats to the affected people.
Would suggest that at least we keep on exchanging informations here.

Regards,
Pratik ————————————————————– Dear All
I am a member since 2005 of Pragatisheel Bairwa CGHS sector 11.The
construction is in final stages.Society is under Cbi scan and also cbi
has file a case in aug.
Last time in society meeting,after Delhi Govt.order,I was informed
that every thing has been sorted out.As soon as this order will reach
to registrar office,allotment will be start.It may takes 2-3months
time.
As reading here and there It is difficult to believe this story.Pls
advice me what is the exact position.When can I hope for allotment and
possession of my flat. Goswami Sharma ——————————————————- Iam a member of Chinar CGHS sector18 (next to Crescent apartments )since 2003. Iam told that stalemate continues regarding allotment .A ll the information which we receive from our society is “nothing is happenning and registrar is not listening”.Enquiry is still going on. I can see lot of people coming together to see our dreams come true with commendable intentions. Does anybody have any information about Chinar CGHS status? What the recent developments and decisions mean in simple layman lingo? Iam sure that other aggrieved members of our society also share my plight and lack of information. I will be greatful to anyone who can apprise us the status. Regards Ravi Shankar ———————————————————- Dear Dwarkeits, A very interesting and important discussion thread is generated herein. A few points I would like to place before this august forum for information. (a) When the Hon’ble High Court delievered its jusdgment on 2.7.07 in Rajiv Mukhopadhyay case, many people including the various legal professionals advanced their own conflicting interpretations. I had also given my interpretation on the said judgment which is the part of this group archieve and it was also published in Hindustan TImes. Now I am happy that my interpretation is being subsustantiated by the series of judicial veridicts. (b) What Mr Jayram is suggesting, has aleady been executed by the AOCAM convened by Mr DPS Rajesh. It may be recalled that a relay hunger strike was organised by the AOCAM at Juntar Mantar followed by a series of candle light agitation. As far as stregnth is concerned, it is for us to put our efforts in such causes and make these movements a success. (c) With respect to the expected action on the part of of judiciary, I humbly disagree with Mr Jayram. I can feel the anguish and pain of victimised members, but at the same time we have to borne in our mind that judiciary is bind by the jducial discipline. It has to act in a defined frame. Kindly appreciate the fact, that the judiciary has given in four consecutive matters a huge relief to the suffering members, i.e, in Rajiv Mukhopadhyay case, in Khattar society case, the Ashadeep, and recently in Sawan case. One may also recall how the Government of India misled the Parliament while answering the unstarred question No- 758 and answered on 17.8.07. Therofore, it is the Government and some agencies with vested interest who are deliberatly trying to twist the cause and to some how linger the matter to provide wrongful gain to some interested bodies/individuals. (d) I have filed five applications under RTI seeking information on this aspect from RCS as well as DDA and I am sure some concrete would emerge out of it. (e) We have already planned and chalked out the strategy. We are going to file the Contempt of court petition before the Hon’ble High Court sooner the court opens on 22.10.07. I hope there going to be the end of our pain and suffering very soon. Regards, Ashok Chaitanya ———————————————————— Dear Mr Ravi shankar evn i am a member of the same chinar cghs since
2002 and till date waiting to get the flat…the present status of
chinar is that there is hearing of the case on 21st nov…..and there
is no respite for atleast chinar cghs in the near sight as the
managing committe and the contractors (builders) have been accused by
the CBI of paying Rs 20 lakhs to rcs for revivnng the society and to
top it all some past members who were members of the society
previously(before us) have also filed a claim for those flats that are
already built and that is what the delhi high court is hearing and in
all the cghs cases that are going on it is our chinar cghs that is
being primarily been focused upon even the supreme court had advised
not odered the delhi high court to finish the hearing of the case by
dec 2006 but that has not been possible…. mr ravi shankar please e
mail me so that the status can be discussed with you personally..

Nishant Bahal ————————————————————– Hi,

I strongly suggest that those hundreds of people affected by non-allotment of flats for no fault of theirs launch a peaceful, indefinite hunger strike in front of the courts or any public place, say a park in Dwarka. Candle-light protest marches etc. would hardly move the judges, who enjoy official accomodation and can afford to take their own time in giving the judgement. Let women and children take the lead in the hunger strike, let them sit in the creeping cold night and day. Every tv channel and newspaper will be there to record their plight. After all, we are living in the era of tv reality shows and they are the best tools to prick the conscience of the judiciary, DDA and the society.

I’m not one of those affected and suggesting this only because I can well understand their plight. To pay house rents and EMI for the loans they have must be a dream turned nightmare.

I believe that the lawyers representing the affected people should argue for the the builders to be made to pay for the losses incurred by those who had joined the societies floated by them in good faith. After all, it is public knowledge that every builder has cornered 10-20 flats in the societies they had floated. The delay by the court in giving the judgement has only made their richer because of the huge appreciation in the prices of the flats.

P. Jayaram —————————————————————— In matter of Sawan CGHS today i.e. on 12.10.2007 the hon’ble High Court has directed RCS to allot the flats of its three members enrolled in so called violation of rule 24(2) before 14th December 2007. So far Ashadeep CGHS case is concerned,on 5.10.2007, Hon’ble High court of Delhi pronounced judgement by way of ‘Writ of Mandamus’ for allotment of flats to 66 members of Ashadeep including 18 members enrolled in so called violation of rule 24(2) before 31.12.2007. In both cases the judgement dt. 2.7.2007 of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in matter of Rajeev Mukhopadhaya and other vrs RCS (WP No. 1403 -14/2006) is upheld Please find below the Judgement in the case of Khatter CGHS in which also the judgement dt. 2.7.2007 of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in matter of Rajeev Mukhopadhaya and other vs. RCS (WP No. 1403 -14/2006) is upheld